The bilateral conflict between Argentina and Uruguay over the UPM pulp mill, on the Uruguayan side of the Uruguay River is once again leading to tension between the two neighbours amid reports that the plant’s Finnish owners plan to increase production.
Argentine Entre Ríos province Governor Sergio Urribarri (and close ally of President Cristina Fernandez) raised questions about the reported planned increase, saying he had “requested clarification from the (Uruguay) government through the Foreign Ministry over the versions and statements from officials regarding the construction of a new plant and an expansion of UPM production limit.”
The request came a day after the Uruguayan National Environment Directorate (Dinama) released a report on water samples in the surrounding area of the pulp mill in the city of Fray Bentos, showing pollution in the river was within allowed limits.
Horacio Melo, the Argentine delegate in the bi-national River Uruguay Administrator Committee (CARU), said it “would be shameful” for Uruguay to unilaterally allow an increase in production at the paper mill, noting that the neighbouring country would “once again be burying the statute that rules on the operations of the Uruguay River.”
Former Uruguayan vice-president Luis Hierro, Uruguay’s representative in CARU, said that Dinama’s studies showed identical results to those by CARU, and that the latter institution was only prevented from publishing the data due to the lack of an agreement between the members of the bi-national committee.
Although the Uruguayan president Jose Mujica announced UPM request at the Council of the Americas summit on August 16, he has refused to comment further on the plans.
However Uruguay’s Executive officials have said that complying with a request from the Argentine president, President Mujica will not make any decisions until after the October 27 mid-term elections in Argentina since all efforts are ‘concentrated on that issue’.
However President Mujica when asked about the issue admitted to have made a decision, which he is keeping to himself and will make public when the time comes.
The mill’s operations “have been placed under the continuing surveillance of CARU and the Scientific Committee, so the plant itself or Uruguayan authorities cannot authorize or implement changes unilaterally,” the Argentine CARU delegation stated with Melo arguing such actions “would be shameful.”
Melo argued that the Hague’s International Court of Justice, which ruled in favour of Uruguay and UPM in 2010 and against Argentina, had “analyzed production of a million tons, so we must analyze this (new level of) production,” adding that “it would be an outrage to hike up the plant’s output without first completing air and water quality studies”.
Source | MercoPress